🇺🇸 United StatesCourt DecisionsEffective

USCIS Permits Sileiri Doe Class Members to Request Reopening or Reconsideration of Adverse Decisions Without a Fee Following Court Order

What changed

Pursuant to a 28 September 2026 order issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Sileiri Doe v. DHS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is allowing qualifying class members to file requests to reopen or reconsider adverse immigration decisions without paying a fee. This remedy applies to non-citizens paroled through the CBP One mobile application whose parole was unlawfully terminated by mass email in April 2025, provided the adverse benefit decision occurred between 1 April 2025 and 21 April 2026. The policy covers benefit decisions that were denied, dismissed, abandoned, administratively closed, rejected, or referred to immigration court, but explicitly excludes requests for employment authorisation based on parole. There is no set deadline to file, though applicants currently in removal proceedings must first secure termination or dismissal of those proceedings before USCIS can exercise jurisdiction over their requests.

Published 26 Oct 2026Effective 28 Sept 2026Source USCIS Newsroom
Official source

The detail

Policy history

USCIS Permits Sileiri Doe Class Members to Request Reopening or Reconsideration of Adverse Decisions Without a Fee Follo

Related changes

  • FranceCourt DecisionsCourt DecisionAmended 31 Dec 2026

    Recognition of filiation for children born abroad via surrogacy (GPA)

    What changed

    The French Court of Cassation issued a significant judgment on 3 July 2026, mandating the recognition of parentage for children born abroad via surrogacy (GPA) in France. This decision applies when a foreign court ruling, designating intended parents, presents guarantees compliant with international public policy. It overrides prior interpretations that would have limited such recognition to the effects of an adoption, ensuring that established filiations are acknowledged as such in France. This clarification aims to uphold the child's best interests, even though surrogacy remains prohibited domestically.

    Published 20 Jul 2026Service-Public.fr — Actualités (droits et démarches)

  • United StatesWork PermitsProposalAmended 9 Nov 2026

    U.S. Proposes $70,000 Initial Fee for Optional Practical Training

    What changed

    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has initiated a proposed rulemaking to introduce substantial new fees for Optional Practical Training (OPT) for F-1 nonimmigrant students. This measure, announced on 8 October 2026, aims to enhance the integrity of the immigration system by deterring fraud and protecting the interests of U.S. workers. Under the proposal, an initial OPT application would incur a fee of $70,000, while any subsequent OPT would cost $30,000. Stakeholders have until 9 November 2026 to submit comments on these proposed changes.

    Published 8 Oct 2026Federal Register — Immigration rules & notices

  • United StatesCourt DecisionsEffectiveEffective 26 Oct 2026

    US Government Confirms Earlier Immigration Fines and Sets Deadline for People to Raise Concerns

    What changed

    On 26 October 2026, the US Department of Homeland Security issued an official notice confirming certain immigration fines that had been imposed under an earlier government procedure. The fines were issued between 27 June 2025 and 13 October 2026. They concern people who were fined for failing to leave the United States after being ordered to do so, failing to leave within the time allowed under a voluntary departure order, or entering or attempting to enter the country unlawfully in certain circumstances. The notice does not introduce a new type of fine. The fines already existed under US immigration law. What changed in June 2025 was the process the government used to issue and review them. DHS has now formally confirmed the earlier decisions made under that process. In simple terms, the department is saying that it stands by those decisions and wants to remove doubts about how they were made.

    Published 26 Oct 2026Effective 26 Oct 2026Federal Register — Immigration rules & notices

  • New ZealandCourt DecisionsCourt DecisionIssued 20 Oct 2026

    New Zealand Employment Court Confirms That Fees Charged for New Zealand Jobs Can Be Illegal Even When Paid Overseas

    What changed

    On 20 October 2026, Immigration New Zealand published an announcement on an important Employment Court judgment confirming that New Zealand's ban on charging employment fees can apply even if a payment is requested or made outside the country. The full Employment Court issued the judgment on 8 October 2026 in two related sets of proceedings: Labour Inspector v Top Produce Ltd and Bhatia v Khanna. The Court resolved uncertainty over how section 12A of the Wages Protection Act 1983 applies to recruitment payments made overseas for jobs based in New Zealand.

    Published 20 Oct 2026Immigration New Zealand — News

1 / 4